Legal Opinion
Poole v. N. v. Deli Maatschappij
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided September 16, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHORT, Vice Chancellor:
Plaintiffs have moved “for leave to reopen for the purpose of introducing evidence to conform to the ruling of the Supreme Court.” They now seek to introduce evidence as to the appropriate present worth factors to be applied to the appraisals. Their motion is filed under Rule 60(b) of this court, Del.C.Ann., which permits the granting of relief to a party from a final judgment or order upon one or more of the grounds therein set forth.
In its opinion on the second appeal in this action the Supreme Court in Poole v. N. V. Deli Maatschappij, Del., 243 A.2d 67, held that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- State Ex Rel. Engineering Commission v. TedescoUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Poole v. N. v. Deli MaatschappijSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Sims v. SlovinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
3Cited by2 opinions
- Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Carlson v. HallinanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006