Legal Opinion

Durdovic v. Wisoff

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge M. Fanelli, J.

This is a motion for an order, pursuant to section 3101 of the Civil Practice Law' and Rules, directing two employees (one an “examiner” and the other an “ investigater ”) of an insurance company representing certain physician-defendants in this malpractice death action to appear for disclosure with respect to “ all the conversations, correspondence and consultation had with William S. Anapoell [now deceased] concerning the treatment, care and death of Paul Durdovic [plaintiff’s intestate], upon the ground that the said William S. Anapoell is now deceased * * * and directing that Employers…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Braxton v. BateyNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API