Legal Opinion

Braxton v. Batey

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

James A. Roe, Jr., J.

This is a motion by the defendant for a protective order vacating plaintiffs’ notice of discovery and inspection of a statement given by the defendant to his own automobile liability insurance carrier and signed by him, describing the automobile accident out of which the instant action arose.

The motion is granted. Whether or not the statement is a privileged communication inasmuch as it was intended as a communication by the defendant to the attorney ultimately to be retained for him by his insurance carrier (cf. Hollien v. Kaye, 194 Misc 821; Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hollien v. KayeNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. EngelsNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Durdovic v. WisoffNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Speight v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API