Legal Opinion
Fisher Bros. v. Mueller Brass Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 6, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 84-0413PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHAPIRO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, allege that defendant, a manufacturer and distributor of copper water tubing, conspired with others in the copper tubing industry to fix prices in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1337. Plaintiffs’ pending motion to certify a class pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be granted.
*573FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed this action on January 20, 1984; they allege that from “as early as 1975 and continuing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Lum v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- In Re Catfish Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1993
- In re Workers' CompensationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.