Gill v. Tuttle
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Anthony Gill appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants on all fourteen causes of action in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.
We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, drawing all factual inferences in favor of the nonmoving party to determine whether the district court properly concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 153, 157 L.Ed.2d 44…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sash v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Roseboro v. GillespieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Starr v. DubeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Lashley v. WakefieldDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Damiani v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.