Legal Opinion
Randolph v. Reisig
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 5, 2007No. Docket 259943PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fer CURIAM.
Flaintiffs appeal as of right the order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10) in this dispute arising out of the interpretation of covenants contained in a property owners’ association agreement. We reverse and remand.
We review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary disposition. A motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10) tests the factual support of a claim. Rice v Auto Club Ins Ass’n, 252 Mich App 25, 30; 651 NW2d 188 (2002). In reviewing a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10), the deciding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. Auto Warehousing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Moore v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Windiate v. LelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Old Port Cove Holdings, Inc. v. CONDO. ASS'N ONE, INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Healing Place at North Oakland Medical Center v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Alles Group LLC v. Msa II LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Canadian Silica Industries, Inc. v. Sand Products CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.