Legal Opinion
Kilroy v. Ruckelshaus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1984No. CA Nos. 82-5894, 82-6097PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Kilroy appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the state and federal defendants.1 Kilroy had challenged the adequacy of the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area Environmental Impact Statement (LA/OMA EIS).
FACTS
This ease is part of a series of lawsuits brought by Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) and Kilroy, a member of PLF’s board of directors.2 The underlying dispute is over which disposal medium — the sea, the land, or the air — can best accept sewage sludge from the City of Los Angeles Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant (Hyperion).
Hyperion discharges sludge…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Rogers C. B. Morton, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Lathan v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Fountain v. FilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Costle v. Pacific Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State of California v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- City of Angoon v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Seattle Audubon Society v. LyonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Eric M. Enos v. John O. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Headwaters, Inc. v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.