Clemente v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff, Jose L. Clemente, an incompetent person (by his guardian ad litem, Eloisa Clemente), appeals from a judgment of dismissal (Code Civ. Proc., § 58Id) of his negligence action for damages as to the only nonfictitious defendants in the action, namely, State of California and Arthur E. Loxsom. This dismissal occurred following the sustaining, without leave to amend, of the general demurrer of these defendants to plaintiffs third amended complaint.
Our examination of the pertinent allegations of the third amended complaint and of the applicable law has led us to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Mann v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Elton v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Nunn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Clemente v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.