Legal Opinion

People v. Alkire

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1981No. Crim. 11887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

Today we hold, in the absence of an express agreement, a person whose guilty plea is obtained in exchange for a promise any future confinement will be for a specified period, may not be later sentenced to a longer term where sentencing follows revocation of probation, even though imposition of sentence was originally suspended.

James Andrew Alkire, an alcoholic and a drug abuser, entered a bargained guilty plea to felonious assault (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)); committed during a drinking episode. The plea was induced by the court’s promise further confinement, if any, would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. People v. HopsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. People v. AlkireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API