Legal Opinion

Bank v. Loar

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Circuit Court, Wayne County. Action by the Huntington National Bank against Oliver. S. Loar and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Loar brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

McWhorter, Judge:

In July, 1897, Oliver S- Loar and George L. Vinson, applied to the Huntington National Bank for permission to renew a nóte ’ of one thousand three hundred and three dollars and sixty-five cents made by George L. Vinson and M. B. Vinson, payable to the order of, and endorsed by, Oliver S. Loar. Subsequent to the prior renewal of said note Oliver S. Loar had transferred his real estate to Francis H. Loar, of which the *541bank bad obtained information. The president of the bank desired the endorsement on said note of said Frances Ií. Loar. Loar and Vinson said-they would have her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosendorf v. PolingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Heard v. C. & O. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Klinkler v. Wheeling Steel & Iron Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Whittemore v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lee v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API