Legal Opinion

Meadows v. Odom

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided March 3, 2005No. CIV.A. 03-960-B-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

POLOZOLA, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 For the reasons which follow, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

I. Factual Background

The Court has previously set forth the factual background in an earlier opinion and will adopt these factual findings by reference herein. 2

The issue the Court must determine on the pending motions is whether the right to pursue one’s chosen occupation is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause and the…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc., and Jill Meadows, M.D. v. Kim Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of MedicineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
  2. Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc., and Jill Meadows, M.D. v. Kim Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of MedicineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
  3. Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc., and Jill Meadows, M.D. v. Kim Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of MedicineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API