Preiss v. Bourne
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.
On the papers submitted on this motion for summary judgment the allegations of the complaint in this action on a promissory note are established beyond dispute and entitle plaintiff to judgment. The opposing affidavit made by defendant Bourne’s attorney is not based on personal knowledge, but on hearsay, and must be disregarded (Waxman v. Williamson, 256 N. Y. 117; Cohen v. Pannia, 7 A D 2d 886).
The position urged by the trustees is specious. The trustees by a prior order of this court dated December 11, 1959, on their application were permitted as stakeholders, pursuant to subdivision 2 of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Waxman v. WilliamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- China Sugar Refining Co. v. Andersen, Meyer & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Construction Management Corp. v. Brown & Root, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1962