Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Bayer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1929No. 27016PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a proceeding which has for its object the allowance for probate of an instrument as the last will of Thomas Bayer, deceased. The county court allowed the instrument as the will, but upon appeal to the district court it was found not to be such will, which finding was reversed by this court (In re Estate of Bayer, 116 Neb. 670) and the cause was remanded for a new trial. The case is here again for review after a second trial in which the will was found not to be the last will and testament of the. deceased. The widow and three children of deceased appear as proponents of said will,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Seebrock v. FedawaNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hamilton v. BayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Boggs v. BoggsNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. O'Malley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fritzler v. KeithleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ewing v. GilbertNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bosheck v. GappaNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Witte v. WitteNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Johnson v. OtleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API