Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Banister

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*49Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay,

COMMISSIONER

Affirming.

This action involves the validity of an antenuptial contract entered into between appellant, Lucy Daniels, and her husband, B. C. Daniels. The question arises in the following way: upon the death of B C. Daniels, appellant brought this action against appellee, B. M. Banister, as administrator of her husband, B. C. Daniels, to recover dower in certain land which B. C. Daniels, prior to his death, conveyed to B. M. Banister, and also to recover her distributable share in the personal property left by B. C. Daniels. B. M. Banister,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tilton v. TiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stratton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Lipski v. LipskiCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
  3. Williamson v. First National Bank of WilliamsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API