Legal Opinion

Burke v. Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

EROM SHELBY. Appeal from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

The defendants are architects, and were each arrested and fined $25 for- failing to take out city license for 1892, and the only question pre*693sented is, whether they are liable for a privilege tax upon their occupation for that year.

Defendants’ contention is that the Acts of the General Assembly of Tennessee, passed at the Extra Session, 1891, page 50, repealed the Act of 1889, Chapter 130, and all other revenue Acts prior in date, and, inasmuch as the Acts of 1891, Extra Session, omitted to tax the occupation of an architect as a privilege, as had been done under Chapter 130, Acts 1889, there…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Corn v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Memphis v. American Express Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State Board of Examiners for Architects & Engineers v. Standard Engineering Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Knoxtenn Theatres, Inc. v. DanceTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Nashville Gas & Heating Co. v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API