Legal Opinion
Benjamin v. Traffic Executive Ass'n-Eastern
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 14, 1988No. 85 Civ. 5482 (LLS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANTON, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion for a trial de novo raise the question of the legal effect to be given the determination of an Arbitration Board that the Eastern Weighing and Inspection Bureau (“EWIB”) employees represented by plaintiffs were not “employees of a rate bureau” entitled to protective benefits under § 219(g) of the Staggers Act, 49 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq., § 10706 note, when the EWIB was abolished and their employment was terminated.
BACKGROUND
The Harley O. Staggers Rail Act of 1980 ("Staggers Act”), 49 U.S.C. § 10101 et…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benjamin v. Traffic Executive Ass'n Eastern RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Global Gold Mining, LLC v. AyvazianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Benjamin v. Traffic Executive Association Eastern RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021