Legal Opinion
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Russo
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided July 30, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-0510BPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCIS J. BOYLE, Senior District Judge.
This is a diversity case, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, governed by the substantive law of Rhode Island. Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Co. (Allstate) seeks a declaration that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify defendants Robert P. Russo and Armand G. DiNapoli under certain insurance policies. Defendants Russo and DiNapoli counterclaim seeking a declaration that Allstate is obligated to defend or indemnify them under these insurance policies. Although the precise legal issues are of the usual type, the circumstances under which the issues arise present…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Case Foundation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Malo v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Bush v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- Elliott Leases Cars, Inc. v. QuigleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American States Ins. Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Allstate Insurance v. RussoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Johnson v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Coulter v. Cigna Property & Casualty CompaniesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Patrick Langevin v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.