Legal Opinion

Harden v. CPLC Estancia LLC

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 21, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04966Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Sharon D. Harden, No. CV-19-04966-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 CPLC Estancia LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Pending before the Court is Sharon Harden’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). 15 (Doc. 9.) By prior order, the Court granted Harden’s Application for Leave to Proceed In 16 Forma Pauperis but dismissed her complaint with leave to amend because the complaint 17 was illegible. (Doc. 7.) The Court will screen Harden’s FAC pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 18

1915(e)(2)1 before it is allowed to be served.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API