Legal Opinion

Kipp v. Cook

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant Sarah Cook from an order of the district court for Sibley mounty, Searle, J., presiding, (acting for the judge of the 8th district,) denying a motion made in August, 1890, to vacate a judgment by default entered February 15, 1884, and to allow an answer to be made.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment entered February 15,1884, and for leave to answer, in an action brought against non-residents, to determine an adverse claim to real property situated in Sherburne county. The action was prosecuted and the judgment rendered, for want of answer, in the district court for the county of Sibley, the summons having been served by publication only in a newspaper printed and published in the same county.

1. The appellant contends that the district court for the county of Sibley, and of the eighth judicial district, was without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Faribault v. MisenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  2. Gill v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  3. Nauer v. BenhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Ellis' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kretzschmar v. MeehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API