Legal Opinion

People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 6, 2013PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated October 4, 2011, which, upon a decision made after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In establishing a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]), the People bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts supporting the determinations sought (see Correction Law § 168-n [3];…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. FinizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LuciusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. McPhersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. BolesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API