Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Mobley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 20, 1969No. 41910PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Judge.
This action and the present appeal involve the zoning and the permitted use of a city block of land located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The City of Tulsa (defendant below) appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, W. J. Mobley, Larkin Bailey and J. F. Kirkpatrick, enjoining the City from interfering with the use of the tract for the purposes permitted in a U-3D (commercial) zoning, as provided in the City zoning ordinances. Plaintiffs’ immediate purpose was to secure a rezoning of the property that would permit it to be used for a supermarket and connected off-street parking.
T…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. BarclaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- City of Tulsa v. SwansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- City of Tulsa v. NicholasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- City of the Village v. McCownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Garrett v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Tulsa Rock Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Clary v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Griffith Realty Co. v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987