Lowe v. Greyhound Corporation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
McLELLAN, District Judge.
The defendant moves that the plaintiff be ordered to further answer defendant’s interrogatories numbered 10, 15, 22, 24, 25, 26, 31, 34, 38 and 39.
The interrogatories propounded by the defendant are forty in number and one of them has five sub-divisions. The action is of a civil nature of a type formerly cognizable as a case at law in -which interrogatories would not have been permissible. By virtue of Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, it is provided in substance that in any civil action, whether originally cognizable…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- American Oil Co. v. Pennsylvania Petroleum Products Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
- Hodge v. OSTEOPATHIC GENERAL HOSPITAL OF RISupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
- Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.