Legal Opinion
United States v. Urdaneta
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 16, 1991No. CR-84-0084PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
The above-captioned case is before the Court upon defendant’s motion under Fed. R.Crim.P. 35, as that rule provided prior to the amendments effective November 1, 1987, to vacate his sentence on the ground that it was illegally imposed or to reduce sentence because of a change of circumstances. As the Rule provided, a court “may correct an illegal sentence at any time” or may reduce a sentence within 120 days after the sentence is imposed or probation is revoked.
Carlos Urdaneta pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. Herbert A. EllenbogenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- SER State of West Virginia v. Hon. David J. Sims, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. CharlesSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2005
- Harvey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- United States v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.