Legal Opinion

Beals v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 4, 1975PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The trustees under the will of Arthur Hunnewell filed this petition for instructions, seeking a determination of the proper distribution to be made of a portion of the trust created under the residuary clause of his will. A judge of the Probate Court reserved decision and reported the case to the Appeals Court on the pleadings and a stipulation of facts. We transferred the case here.

Arthur Hunnewell died, a resident of Wellesley, in 1904, leaving his wife and four daughters. His will placed the residue of his property in a trust, the income of which was to be paid to his wife during her life.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sewall v. WilmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Walker v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Greenough v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Pitman v. PitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. PrindleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John F. White, Administrator D.B.N., C.T.A., of the Estate of Theodore N. Townsend, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. McKelvy v. TerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Beals v. COMMISSIONER OF CORPORATIONS & TAXATIONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Children's HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. D'AMARIOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API