Legal Opinion
Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Prindle
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 1, 1935PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
These two cases were consolidated for trial and were reserved for the full court upon the pleadings, the master’s report and the interlocutory decree confirming the same. There were no objections to the master's report or to the confirmation thereof. Each case is a bill in equity-for instructions. The same trust company is the plaintiff in both cases. In the Suffolk case the plaintiff is trustee under a trust indenture, dated August 2, 1918, from one Tripp, who conveyed as a “straw” for Antoinette H. Saville. In the Middlesex case the plaintiff is trustee under the will of Antoinette H.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sewall v. WilmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Polsey v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Bundy v. United States Trust Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Sells v. DelgadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Morse v. StearnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Mazzola v. MyersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Pitman v. PitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Merchants National Bank v. MorrisseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- McKelvy v. TerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.