Legal Opinion

Smith v. Scio Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1988No. Docket 98014Published

1Opinion of the Court

173 Mich. App. 381 (1988)

433 N.W.2d 855

SMITH

v.

SCIO TOWNSHIP

Docket No. 98014.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 5, 1988.

Keusch & Flintoft, P.C. (by Peter C. Flintoft), for plaintiff.

Reading & Etter (by John L. Etter), for defendant.

Before: DANHOF, C.J., and SHEPHERD and C.L. BOSMAN,[*] JJ.

C.L. BOSMAN, J.

The primary question presented in this appeal is whether the Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, § 31, limits a township board's taxing authority to its preincorporation level without a separate vote of the electors when the electors of a general law township vote to become a charter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Midland Township v. State Boundary CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Waterford School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Crawford County v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API