Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Commercial Banking Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 1933No. [No. 11, October Term, 1933.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pattison, L,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

An attachment was issued on the 27th day of June, 1932, upon a confessed judgment for the sum of $303.03, with interest from the 24th day of Junei, 1932, and costs. The judgment was entered in favor of the Commercial Banking Corporation, the appellee, against Esther Y. Lawrence, a young unmarried woman, one of the appellants, and was laid in the hands of the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea. Company, the other appellant, as garnishee.

The garnishee confessed that, at the time of laying the attachment, there was justly due and owing by it to Esther V.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. Root ex rel. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  2. Muhr v. PinoverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  3. Newbold v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  4. Fowler v. State Ex Rel. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  5. First National Bank v. WecklerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Catonsville Nursing Home, Inc. v. LovemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Chames v. DeMayoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. Standard Founders, Inc. v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. In Re GordonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API