Legal Opinion

In Re the Tax Appeal of the Queen's Medical Center

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1983No. 8585PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The Tax Appeal Court declared the gross income from the operation of an office building and an adjoining parking lot by The Queen’s Medical Center (Queen’s or the taxpayer) exempt from the tax imposed by HRS § 237-13(10) 1 because it found “the primary purpose of the taxpayer’s activities in the Physicians Office Building and parking facility was to furnish better, more efficient and cost effective, complete medical care to patients, and not to produce income.” We reverse the court’s ruling because the exemption from excise taxation expressly provided for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Travelers Insurance v. Hawaii Roofing, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re the Tax Appeal of Central Union ChurchHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Oceanic Foundation v. KondoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LoHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kaiama v. AguilarHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. ElineHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re the Tax Appeal of Queen's Medical CenterHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API