Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. Jernigan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Panola. Tried below before the Hon. M. W. Wheeler.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

It is true that in suits for a divorce, the District Courts are, to a considerable extent, the judges, not only of the law, but of the facts of a case, and therefore it is said in Moore v. Moore, 22 Texas, 240: “ In decreeing a divorce, the judge “ does not proceed as in other eases, upon the verdict of the “ jury, but upon his own judgment, after the jury, by their “ verdict, have affirmed the truth of the material allegations of “ the petition. The mind of the judge must be satisfied, not only of the sufficiency of the causes alleged, but of the “ truth and sufficiency of the evidence by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McGrath v. SinclairMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Caldwell v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Grisham v. GrishamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Moon v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Gentry v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API