Jernigan v. Jernigan
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Panola. Tried below before the Hon. M. W. Wheeler.
1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.
It is true that in suits for a divorce, the District Courts are, to a considerable extent, the judges, not only of the law, but of the facts of a case, and therefore it is said in Moore v. Moore, 22 Texas, 240: “ In decreeing a divorce, the judge “ does not proceed as in other eases, upon the verdict of the “ jury, but upon his own judgment, after the jury, by their “ verdict, have affirmed the truth of the material allegations of “ the petition. The mind of the judge must be satisfied, not only of the sufficiency of the causes alleged, but of the “ truth and sufficiency of the evidence by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by11 opinions
- McGrath v. SinclairMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
- Caldwell v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Grisham v. GrishamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Moon v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Gentry v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.