Legal Opinion

Paisley v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1974No. Appeal, No. 684 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Thomas W. Paisley (claimant) was receiving unemployment compensation when he was referred to a possible job paying $2.00 an hour.1 At his job interview, the claimant informed the prospective employer that he would be recalled to his old job at an indefinite time in the future and that, when so recalled, he would return to that job. Because of this statement, he was not hired, and further benefits were thereafter denied him by the Bureau of Employment Security (Bureau).

Following a hearing on the claimant’s appeal, the referee upheld the Bureau’s ruling on the basis that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pinto Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Maribello Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Gavlick Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knox v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. MatthysCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Thomas v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Barry v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API