Legal Opinion

Noone v. Noone

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2013No. 2012-CA-01849-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. At issue in the instant case is the interpretation of Mississippi Code Section 11-21-1(2) (Rev.2004); particularly whether the statute, which limits partition of homestead property “exempted from execution” and owned by spouses to partition by agreement only, prohibits one spouse from obtaining a partition of jointly owned property by chancery decree against the other. As more fully detailed below, the issue is the meaning of the phrase “exempted from execution.” The chancellor held that Section 11-21-1 wholly prohibits the partitioning of spousal property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Natchez, Miss. v. SullivanMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Anglado v. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Guardianship of DuckettMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Wallace v. Town of RaleighMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Franklin Collection Service, Inc. v. KyleMississippi Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pat Harrison Waterway District v. Lamar County, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Pat Harrison Waterway District v. Lamar County, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API