Pat Harrison Waterway District v. Lamar County, Mississippi

¶ 76. I dissent because, in my opinion, the majority’s holding ignores a directive *952from the Legislature — which it has every right to enact and every right to'‘expect the courts of the state to follow — that mandates that the act creating the. Pat Harrison Waterway District be liberally construed to’'effect the purposes for which it was passed, including the preservation of the District. See 5K Farms, Inc. v. Miss. Dep’t of Revenue, 94 So.3d 221, 227 (¶ 21) (Miss.2012) (“[T]he courts are without the light to substitute their judgment for that of thé Legislature as to the wisdom and policy of…