Legal Opinion

State v. Real Property at 633 East 640 North, Orem

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1997No. 950459PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Claimant Linda Cannon appeals from a trial court order forfeiting her interest in real property located at 633 East 640 North in Orem, Utah. The trial court ordered forfeiture of the property under the Utah Controlled Substances Act, section 58-37-13 of the Utah Code,' because officers of the Utah County Sheriffs Department seized a one-pound brick of marijuana during a warranted search of the property. Cannon claims that the property was not properly subject to forfeiture because the State failed to offer any evidence to meet several of the statutory elements that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ColwellUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BoydUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State in Interest of MLCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API