State Ex Rel. Payton v. City of Riverside
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is an action in mandamus. This appeal follows a judgment ordering appellant city to issue a liquor license to respondents. The judgment is reversed.
Constitutional challenge has been made toward appellants’ passage of a city ordinance upon the grounds of denial of due process and equal protection. Since this challenge does not involve a treaty or statute of the United States or a statute or provision of the Constitution of Missouri, jurisdiction lies with this court. Article V, Section 3, Missouri Constitution, as amended, 1976.
The record reveals the following pertinent…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Oliver Cadillac Co. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Parking Systems, Inc. v. Kansas City Downtown Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Kopper Kettle Restaurants, Inc. v. City of St. RobertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carmen Austell v. Kimberly SprengerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Vaughn v. EmsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Casey's General Stores, Inc. v. City of West PlainsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Casey's General Stores, Inc. v. City Council of SalemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jordan v. City of CentervilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.