Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Schneider

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 1916No. 944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Gray County Court; Siler Faulkner, Judge. Action by E. M. Wallace against Alex Schneider and wife. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.

Wallace sued the Schneiders to recover upon a Kentucky judgment obtained against them in the Franklin quarterly court of Franklin county, Ky., in the year 1908, for the sum of $152.76, 6 per cent, .interest, and. costs of suit. Upon recovery in the justice court the defendants appealed to the county court, and answered that plaintiff did not have a valid and subsisting judgment against them. The county court found that the judgment was not a valid, binding, and subsisting judgment against the defendants, for the reason that it is not shown to be one that could have been enforced “at this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Harvey v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Tourtelot v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Wolf v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitchim v. MitchimTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Garman v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Ryan v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Heidingsfelder v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API