Legal Opinion

People v. Jeans

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1926No. Docket No. 941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of murder and was convicted of manslaughter. He has appealed from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial

The evidence is amply sufficient to support the verdict and judgment and appellant makes no contention to the eon trary. In appellant’s brief it is said: “Two points are made on the appeal, viz.: 1. That the court erred in refusing to give an instruction requested by the defendant; and 2. That the district attorney was guilty of misconduct prejudicial to the defendant.”

The instruction referred to reads as follows: “I charge you…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. KrompholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. MolinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. People v. De LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. McDonnelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API