Legal Opinion

People v. Naulls

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1996No. 95CA0009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

Defendant, James Naulls, appeals the judgment of conviction entered after the court denied his motion to dismiss the charges against him based upon the People’s failure to bring him to trial within the limitation period outlined in the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (UMDDA), § 16-14-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A). We reverse.

On September 23, 1993, while serving a sentence in the Department of Corrections as the result of a previous conviction, defendant was charged with two counts of distribution of a controlled substance and one count of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HiginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. FlemingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. MartinezColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. GarciaColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. SlusherColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. In Re Marriage of HelmichColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. Sa'RaColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API