Legal Opinion

Evanchyk v. Stewart

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2002No. CV-01-0358-CQPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Michael Evanchyk filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Seeking relief under 18 U.S.C. § 2254, Evanchyk named Terry L. Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, and others as Respondents (“the state,” collectively). District Judge William D. Browning certified questions of Arizona law to this court. See Rule 27, Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. We accepted jurisdiction, ordered supplemental briefing, and heal’d oral argument.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 In his certification order, the district…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Michael John Evanchyk, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Terry Stewart Janet Napolitano, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. State of Arizona v. Eric BoystonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API