Legal Opinion

Hall v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1957No. 3940PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By PHILLIPS, J.

Plaintiff Hall, his employee Elmer L.- Burley, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company insurer of plaintiff’s Studebaker automobile, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company insurer of plaintiff’s Willys Jeep will be referred to herein as Hall, Burley, United States Fidelity and Guaranty and Nationwide respectively.

While trying to start the jeep by towing with the Studebaker Burley was squeezed between the two vehicles while waiting to attach a tow line to the Studebaker and was injured allegedly as the result of Hall’s negligence in permitting the Studebaker, which…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Wylie Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API