Tritch v. Norton
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal fr^m County Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Macon, C.
This action was commenced in September of 1882, by appehees Norton & La Due, on their demand for balance due them on their contract with Machen for the construction of a dwelling-house, and for the enforcement of their mechanic’s lien asserted for the same against lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, in block 9, in Waddell & Machen’s subdivision of Denver. Machen and others were made parties defendants, appellant being the only-contending defendant at the hearing of the cause.
In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that on March, 15, 1882, Machen was owner of said lots 7, 8, 9 and 10';; *338that on that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bridwell v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Hoover v. WheelerMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Williams v. Uncompahgre Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Morrison v. Carey-Lombard Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1893
- Rogers Concrete, Inc. v. Jude ContractorsColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Folsom v. CragenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.