Legal Opinion
Hefferman v. Bitton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1989No. Nos. 88-2989, 88-15094PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
The district court below ordered lender Bernard Brill to pay consumer Diane K. Hefferman a $1000 civil penalty plus costs and attorney’s fees for failing to comply with the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667e (1982 & Supp. Y 1987). Hefferman, dissatisfied with the civil penalty, appeals from the court’s refusal to order Brill to refund the interest and loan costs that she has paid him. Brill cross-appeals from the judgment against him and the denial of attorney’s fees. Lenders Edward F. Reid, Bernadette Y. Bitton, and Nathan Bitton, whom the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- King v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Semar v. Platte Valley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Prenzler v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hayer v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- R.G. Financial Corp. v. Vergara-NuñezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Larry Meyer Virginia Badalamente Meyer v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Mehta v. Wells Fargo Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Weber v. LangholzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Jones v. Saxon Mortgage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.