Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Britton

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 28, 1984No. 83-7229PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Chief Judge:

This case concerns the claim of a habeas petitioner that the Allen charge, see Allen v. U.S., 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896), given to the jury at his trial for murder resulted in a coerced verdict of guilty and hence a mandatory life sentence. Because of a procedural default not excused by the required showing of cause and prejudice, we are barred from considering the merits of petitioner’s claim and, therefore, affirm the district court’s denial of relief.

I. FACTS

Petitioner Vaughn shot and killed Starks in 1976 as Starks was walking up the front steps…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Tyus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API