Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Hanafin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1944No. Docket No. 60, Calendar No. 42,445PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is suit for damages on account

of injuries réceived by - plaintiff in a collision between an automobile in wbicb she was a passenger and one owned by defendant John Iianafin, driven by his wife, Marie Iianafin, with his consent. At the close of plaintiff’s case and again at the close of all the proofs the defendants moved for a directed verdict, decision on which was reserved by the court, the case submitted to the jury, and plaintiff had verdict for $12,000. Defendants then moved for judgment non obstante veredicto, which was granted. From the judgment for defendants entered thereon,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Camp v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Banzhof v. RocheMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Carr v. St. Louis Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  4. Wallace v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bordner v. McKernanMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Barringer v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. O’neal v. St John Hospital & Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Meier v. HoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API