Legal Opinion
Hendricks v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1993No. 92-SC-662-DGPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.
This appeal is from a decision of the circuit court which affirmed a district court holding that Hendricks and Hellard were guilty of nude dancing in violation of a Newport city ordinance. Each defendant was sentenced to 30 days in jail and a fine of $100 which was conditionally discharged for a period of two years.
The circuit and district courts determined that the Newport ordinance did not infringe on any constitutionally protected rights and was not vague or overbroad, nor an unreasonable exercise of police power.
The questions presented are whether the Newport…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Chris Hartman v. Jeremy ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Recreational Developments of Phoenix, Inc. v. City of PhoenixDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
- People v. Business or Businesses Located at 2896 West 64th AvenueColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Taverns for Tots, Inc. v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.