Legal Opinion
Green v. Anderson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 28, 1993No. Civ. S-92-2118PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are California residents who have moved or relocated to the State of California within the past twelve months and seek welfare benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) program. 1 California recently enacted a durational residency requirement of one year for full AFDC benefits; until the applicant for AFDC has resided in the State for twelve consecutive months, the applicant’s level of benefits may not exceed what the family would have received in the state of prior residence. Cal.Welf. & Inst. Code §…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Beno v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Maldonado v. HoustounCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Anderson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Roe v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.