Legal Opinion

Hammit v. Westbrook

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1953No. 3043PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LONG, Justice.

The parties will carry the same designation here as in the trial court. Plaintiff, Little Westbrook, sued O. L. Hammit to recover damages which he claims on account of the negligence of defendant in failing to put oil in the crank case of his automobile after same had been drained at defendant’s filling station. Upon a trial the jury found that defendant agreed to change the oil in the crank case of plaintiff’s automobile; that defendant failed to refill the crank case with oil and assessed plaintiff’s damages at $375. Based upon these findings, the court entered judgment for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. CastileTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. VickeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Whitefield v. WhitefieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Phenix Dairy v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bulatao v. Kauai Motors, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bulatao v. Kauai Motors, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API