Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Dailey Electric Supply Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided January 21, 1974No. CA 3-4751-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, Jr., Chief Judge.

Plaintiff James M. Robertson sued his employer Lucius L. Dailey, doing business as Dailey Electric Supply Co., under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 1 for back wages and overtime pay in the amount of $1,444 and an additional equal sum as liquidated damages. Dailey’s defense, simply stated, is that he is not covered by the statute. I agree, for reasons detailed below, and Robertson is entitled to nothing.

The pleadings and the evidence presented during a trial before the Court show that during the time in question 2 Robertson was the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. National Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farrell v. PikeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API