Rushing v. Worsham & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Foreclosure of mortgage. Before Judge Felton. Houston superior court. April term, 1897.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
On October 12, 1894, Rushing executed to Worsham & Co. a promissory note for $900, due November 11, 1895, together with a mortgage on certain real estate to secure the payment of the same. To a proceeding instituted by Worsham & Co., to foreclose this mortgage, Rushing filed a plea alleging that usury was included in and made a part of the consideration of the mortgage. From this plea it appears that, at intervals during the spring of 1894, Worsham & Co., sold to Rushing merchandise, to be paid for on October 1, 1894. In the plea the cash prices of the various bills of merchandise sold are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reger v. O'NealWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Borum v. FoutsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Ford v. HancockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Brooks v. . AveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Irvin v. MathewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- E. Tris Napier Co. v. TrawickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Hillman's v. EM'N AL'S.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Richardson v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.