Legal Opinion

Ex parte Vickery

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. This is a case of original jurisdiction. The facts in the case are «stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

Upon petition to a justice of this court a writ of Habeas Corpus was granted returnable before the court.

We have serious doubts whether any issues are presented on the pleadings that call for a decision from us in this form of procedure, but the chief point sought to be raised by the petitioner is so manifestly not well taken, and as it 'has been asserted that there is embarrassment of jurisdiction in the trial courts because of the point we may as well dispose of it.

The petitioner was indicted for murder in the first degree in the Circuit Court for Escambia County, was *142convicted thereunder…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Ex Parte WarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  3. Golding v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Buckheitt v. ButtSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  5. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Griswold v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. Deeb v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. West v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API