Legal Opinion

In the Matter of D. D.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 2003No. 03-01-00477-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.

The State filed an original and first amended petition alleging appellant D.D. engaged in delinquent conduct by committing the offense of retaliation. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 36.06 (West 2003). In a bench trial, the court found appellant had engaged in delinquent conduct by committing the offense of terroristic threat. See Tex. PemCode Ann. § 22.07 (West 2003). In one issue, appellant contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate appellant delinquent by committing the offense of terroristic threat because that offense was neither alleged in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jacob v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Van Hoang v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Helleson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1995
  5. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daryl Edward Barnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2020
  2. Terri Regina Lang v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
  3. in the Matter of B.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  4. in the Matter of B.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API